## Nonlinear epsilon scan for NTP case

Sept 11, 1997

I ran the Chi vs. epsilon (r/R) scaling with higher resolution,
larger perpendicular boxes, and for longer times. Although
these new runs are slightly different in detail, the conclusions
based on the preliminary results I put up last week hold.

--------------------------------

The higher resolution run time histories to compare with
Andris's '94 IAEA Fig. 2 are shown below:

These runs used our "4+2" equations and a parallel box length of
-pi to pi, the same as in the GK particle runs.

These three runs seem reasonably converged and saturated. They represent
32 hours of C90 CPU time and 95 hours of C90 wall clock time.

The trend is still pretty clear: the difference between GF and GK
does not scale strongly with epsilon. If the Hinton-Rosenbluth
effect were the dominant cause of the difference between the
GF and GK results, chi_GF/chi_GK would scale something like 1+const*sqrt(eps),
as shown below in red.

--Mike

Back to index of cyclone pages

Back to Mike Beer's home page