2004 II 4
From QED
This is a well-behaved function around x = 0, so we write :

Shifting the first by two:
![\sum_{n}\left[a_{n+2}\left(n+2\right)\left(n+1\right)+\left(n+1\right)a_{n}\right]x^{n}=0](../../../images/math/7/3/5/73564de6874535fc9bceebd5c9165dc9.png)
Then we get the recurrence relation:

We get solutions for a0 = 0 and a1 = 0:

The equation is:

Using y˜eS:

Balance between ,
. There is an alternate
balance between 1 and
, or
S = − logx. So the two asymptotic values are:

We use the integral:

Plugging in:
![\int\left[-t^{2}+xit+1\right]f\left(t\right)e^{ixt}dt=0](../../../images/math/8/0/8/80844246110cabae2095cc1edb58e2d6.png)
Integrating by parts:
![\left.tf\left(t\right)e^{ixt}\right|_{C}-\int\left[t^{2}f\left(t\right)+tf^{\prime}\left(t\right)\right]e^{ixt}dt=0](../../../images/math/7/2/0/7207c0160f59edb2c7b377733d114ac5.png)
Solving this differential equation:

Integrating:

Or:

Then the boundary becomes:

This goes to zero as .
So the Fourier-Laplace solutions are:

We can replace t with − t in fA to get:

Then we can form:


is even and corresponds to y2.
Ask seth.
This page was recovered in October 2009 from the Plasmagicians page on Generals_2004_II_4 dated 22:29, 9 May 2007.